210820 california prop 22 unconstitutional ac 1000p

Judge rules California ride-hailing law unconstitutional

LOS ANGELES — A decide Friday struck down a California poll measure that exempted Uber and different app-based ride-hailing and supply providers from a state regulation requiring drivers to be categorized as workers eligible for advantages and job protections.

Alameda County Superior Courtroom Choose Frank Roesch dominated that Proposition 22 was unconstitutional.

Voters permitted the measure in November after Uber, Lyft and different providers spent $200 million in its favor, making it the costliest poll measure in state historical past.

Uber stated it deliberate to enchantment, establishing a struggle that would seemingly find yourself within the California Supreme Courtroom.

“This ruling ignores the need of the overwhelming majority of California voters and defies each logic and the regulation,” firm spokesman Noah Edwardsen stated. “You don’t must take our phrase for it: California’s lawyer normal strongly defended Proposition 22’s constitutionality on this very case.”

He stated the measure will stay in drive pending the enchantment.

The decide sided with three drivers and the Service Staff Worldwide Union in a lawsuit that argued the measure improperly eliminated the state Legislature’s capacity to grant employees the appropriate to entry to the state employees’ compensation program.

“For 2 years, drivers have been saying that democracy can’t be purchased. And at this time’s determination reveals they have been proper,” stated Bob Schoonover, president of the SEIU California State Council.

Proposition 22 shielded app-based ride-hailing and supply corporations from a labor regulation that required such providers to deal with drivers as workers and never unbiased contractors, who don’t must obtain advantages comparable to paid sick go away or unemployment insurance coverage.

Uber and Lyft threatened to go away the state if voters rejected the measure.

Labor spent about $20 million to problem the proposition.

The state Supreme Courtroom initially declined to listen to the case in February — primarily on procedural grounds — however left open the potential of a decrease courtroom problem.


Supply hyperlink

About PARTH SHAH

Check Also

kamloops trudeau rosanne casimir

B.C.-based First Nation may put names to unmarked graves with new residential school documents

The management of Tk’emlúps te Secwépemc hopes to determine and find lacking kids believed to …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

x